Methods and Instrumentation for Estimation of Wave Propagation and Scattering Parameters

ABSTRACT

Estimation and imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters in a material object where the material parameters for wave propagation and scattering has a nonlinear dependence on the wave field amplitude. The methods comprise transmitting at least two pulse complexes composed of co-propagating high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pulses along at least one LF and HF transmit beam axis, where said HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulse along at least one HF transmit beam, and where one of the amplitude and polarity of the LF pulse varies between at least two transmitted pulse complexes. At least one HF receive beam crosses the HF transmit beam at an angle &gt;20 deg to provide at least two HF cross-beam receive signals from at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses. The HF cross-beam receive signals are processed to estimate one or both of i) a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD), and ii) a nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) of the transmitted HF pulse for said cross-beam observation cell.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/621,952 which was filed on Jan. 25, 2018; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/732,409 which was filed on Sep. 17, 2018; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/780,810 which was filed on Dec. 17, 2018.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to methods and instrumentation for imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters of an object using transmission of dual frequency pulse complexes composed of a high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pulse. Imaging with acoustic pressure waves is shown as an example, but the methods are also useful for imaging with shear elastic waves and coherent electromagnetic waves. Applications of the invention are for example, but not limited to, medical imaging and therapy, non-destructive testing, industrial and biological inspections, geological applications, SONAR and RADAR applications.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Transmission of dual frequency pulse complexes composed of a high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pulse for imaging of nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters of an object is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,641,613; 8,038,616; 8,550,998 and 9,291,493. The methods also provide suppression of multiple scattering noise (reverberation noise) and improved imaging of linear and nonlinear scatterers. Imaging with coherent acoustic pressure waves is shown as an example, but it is clear that the methods are also useful for imaging with all types of coherent wave imaging, such as shear elastic waves and electromagnetic waves. The cited methods require estimation of one or both of a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) and a nonlinear propagation pulse form distortion (PFD) which both are challenging tasks. The present invention describes new methods and instrumentation for improved estimation of both the NPD and the PFD, and provides scatter images with reduced multiple scattering noise and images of nonlinear scatterers. Combined with measurements with zero LF pulse, the invention also provides estimates of linear propagation and scattering parameters, that combined with the estimates of nonlinear parameters is used to obtain a thermo-elastic description of the object.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This summary gives a brief overview of components of the invention and does not present any limitations as to the extent of the invention, where the invention is solely defined by the claims appended hereto.

The current invention provides methods and instrumentation for estimation and imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters in a material object where the material parameters for wave propagation and scattering has a nonlinear dependence on the wave field amplitude. The methods have general application for both acoustic and shear elastic waves such as found in SONAR, seismography, medical ultrasound imaging, and ultrasound nondestructive testing, and also coherent electromagnetic waves such as found in RADAR and laser imaging. In the description below one uses acoustic waves as an example, but it is clear to anyone skilled in the art how to apply the methods to elastic shear waves and coherent electromagnetic waves.

In its broadest form, the methods comprises transmitting at least two pulse complexes composed of co-propagating high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pulse along at least one LF and HF transmit beam axis, where said HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulse along at least one HF transmit beam, and where one of the amplitude and polarity of the LF pulse varies between at least two transmitted pulse complexes, where the amplitude of the LF pulse can be zero for a pulse complex and the amplitude of at least one LF pulse of said at least two transmitted pulse complexes is non-zero.

Further, directing at least one HF receive cross-beam to cross said at least one HF transmit beam at an angle >20 deg to form a cross-beam observation cell by the cross-over region between a HF transmit beam and said at least one HF receive cross-beam, and using said at least one HF receive cross-beam to record at least two HF cross-beam receive signals from the transmitted HF pulses scattered by object structures in said cross-beam observation cell for at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses. The HF cross-beam receive signals are processed to estimate one or both of i) a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD), and ii) a nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) of the transmitted HF pulse for said cross-beam observation cell, where one or both of said NPD and PFD are used in the further processing to estimate one or more of i) a local nonlinear propagation parameter, and ii) a local quantitative nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p), and iii) a local value of the linear pulse propagation velocity co, and iv) a linearly scattered HF signal, and v) a nonlinearly scattered HF signal, and vi) local changes in tissue structure during therapy, and vii) local changes in tissue temperature during HIFU therapy.

In general said at least one HF receive cross-beam is focused on the HF transmit beam axis forming a cross-beam observation cell as the cross-over region of the HF transmit and HF receive cross-beams.

A local nonlinear propagation parameter can be estimated through receiving scattered signals from the HF transmitted pulse for at least two HF receive cross-beams with close distance along the HF transmit beam, and estimating a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) of the transmitted HF pulse at the at least two cross-beam observation cells determined by the cross-over between the HF transmit beam and each of the said at least two HF receive cross-beams. Said estimated NPDs from neighbouring cross-beam observation cells along a HF transmit beam are combined to form estimates of the local nonlinear propagation parameter. Scaling said estimated local nonlinear propagation parameter by an estimate of the LF pulse pressure at the location of the HF pulse gives a quantitative estimate of the nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p). The estimated β_(p) gives rise to an estimate of the local linear propagation velocity c₀, a change in tissue structure during therapy, and a change in the local tissue temperature during HIFU therapy. Both a local nonlinearly and a linearly scattered signal may be obtained through correcting said at least two HF receive signals with one or both of i) the NPD, and ii) the PFD to produce two corrected signals, and combining said at least two corrected signals.

The invention further devices to also use a HF back-scatter receive beam with the same beam axis as the HF transmit beam to record HF back-scatter receive signals. The estimated PFD and/or the NPD are processed to provide estimated multiple scattering PFD and NPD. The at least two HF back-scatter signals from at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses are corrected with the estimated multiple scattering PFD and/or NPD to produce at least two corrected HF back-scatter signals. The at least two corrected HF back-scatter signals are combined to provide HF noise-suppressed back-scatter signals with suppression of multiple scattering noise, for example as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,038,616; 8,550,998; 9,291,493.

2D and 3D images of the estimated parameters and signals may be obtained by scanning the transmit beam and matched HF cross-beam and HF back-scatter beams across a 2D or a 3D region of the object, and recording HF back-scatter and/or cross-beam receive signals and back-scattered signals with further processing according to the invention to produce local estimates of said parameters.

The size of the cross-beam observation cell may then with 2D or 3D scanning be synthetically reduced through spatial filtering of the HF cross-beam receive signals from several neighbouring cross-beam observation cells.

The invention further devices to use HF back-scatter receive beams that are equal to the HF transmit beams, and for multiple depths carry through lateral filtering of one of i) the HF back-scatter receive signals, and ii) the HF noise-suppressed back-scatter signals to produce HF signals from combined HF transmit and receive beams that are synthetically focused for said multiple depths, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,291,493.

The invention also describes instruments for carrying through the practical measurements and processing according to the invention, in particular to obtain local estimates of the PFD and/or the NPD, and one or more of the parameters:

i) a local nonlinear propagation parameter, and ii) a local quantitative nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p), and iii) a local value of the linear pulse propagation velocity c₀, and iv) a linearly scattered HF signal, and v) a nonlinearly scattered HF signal, and vi) local changes in tissue structure during therapy, and vii) local changes in tissue temperature during HIFU therapy.

With one version of the instrument, HF back-scatter and/or cross beam receive signals are generated in dedicated beam forming HW according to known methods, and digital HF receive signals are transferred to the processing structure for storage and further processing in a general SW programmable processor structure of different, known types.

In another version of the instrument the individual receiver element signals are digitized and transferred to the memory of a general SW programmable processor structure where the receive beam forming and further processing is SW programmed.

The instrument comprises a display system for display of estimated parameters and images according to known technology, and user input to the instrument according to known methods. The transmit and receive of HF and LF pulses are obtained with known transducer arrays, for example as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,727,156 and 8,182,428.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows example pulse complexes comprising a high frequency (HF) pulse and a low frequency (LF) pulse, where two typical forms of LF pulses are shown.

FIG. 2 shows a measurement setup to obtain acoustic measurements for estimation of HF received signals for one or both of estimation and imaging of several image signals related to the nonlinear material parameters of the material.

FIG. 3 shows by example typical HF receive signals for different transmitted LF pulses.

FIG. 4 shows examples of an estimated nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) and its gradient along the HF pulse propagation direction.

FIG. 5 shows variation of the nonlinear elasticity parameter β_(p)=β_(n)κ for connective tissue, breast glandular tissue, and fat.

FIG. 6 shows a ring array transducer structure and processing system for estimation and imaging of linear and nonlinear nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters according to the invention.

FIG. 7a shows a first ultrasound transducer systems for estimation and imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters according to the invention.

FIG. 7b shows another ultrasound transducer systems for estimation and imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters according to the invention.

FIG. 8 shows a bloch diagram for an instrument according to the invention.

FIG. 9 shows schematically an HF transmit beam, an HF receive cross-beam, and a HF back-scatter receive beam equal to the HF transmit beam

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Theory of nonlinear propagation and scattering

A. Wave Equation for 2nd Order Nonlinear Bulk Elasticity

For acoustic waves in fluids and solids, nonlinear bulk elasticity is commonly defined through a Taylor series expansion of the acoustic pressure to the 2^(nd) order in relation to the mass density as

$\begin{matrix} {{p = {{{A\frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0}}} + {\frac{B}{2}\left( \frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0}} \right)}} = {A\frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0}}\left( {1 + {\frac{B}{2A}\left( \frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0}} \right)}} \right)}}}{A = {{\rho_{0}\left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial\rho} \right)}_{0,S} = \frac{1}{\kappa}}}{B = {\rho_{0}^{2}\left( \frac{\partial^{2}p}{\partial\rho^{2}} \right)}_{0,S}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

p(r,t) is the instantaneous, local acoustic pressure as a function of space vector, r, and time t, ρ(r, t)=ρ₀(r, t)+ρ₁(r,t) is the instantaneous mass density with ρ₀ as the equilibrium density for p=0, κ(r) is the isentropic compressibility, and B is a nonlinearity parameter. We use the Lagrange spatial description where the co-ordinate vector r refers to the location of the material point in the unstrained material (equilibrium), and ψ(r,t) describes the instantaneous, local displacement of a material point from its unstrained position r, produced by the particle vibrations in the wave.

The term A·(ρ₁/ρ₀) describes linear bulk elasticity, and hence does the last term (B/2A)(ρ₁/ρ₀) in the parenthesis represent deviation from linear elasticity. The parameter B/2A is therefore commonly used to describe the magnitude of nonlinear bulk elasticity.

The continuity equation in Lagrange coordinates takes the form

$\begin{matrix} {{{- {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}} = {\frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho} = \frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0} + \rho_{1}}}}{\frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho_{0}} = {{- \frac{\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}{1 + {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}}} \approx {- {\nabla{\underset{\_}{\psi}\left( {1 - {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}} \right)}}}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

To the 2^(nd) order in Δψ we then get isentropic state equation as

$\begin{matrix} {{p = {{{{- A}{\nabla{\underset{\_}{\psi}\left( {1 - {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}} \right)}}} + {\frac{B}{2}\left( {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}} \right)^{2}}} = {{- \frac{1}{\kappa}} + {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}} + {\frac{\beta_{n}}{\kappa}\left( {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}} \right)^{2}}}}}{\beta_{n} = {{1 + \frac{B}{2A}} = {1 + {\frac{B}{2}\kappa}}}}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

Eqs.(1, 3) describes isentropic compression, where there is no transformation of elastic energy to heat, i.e. no absorption of acoustic energy in the wave propagation. Linear absorption can be introduced by adding a temporal convolution term h_(ab)⊗∇ψ, where h_(ab)(r,t) is a convolution kernel that represents absorption of wave energy to heat due to deviation from fully isentropic compression.

For the analysis of wave propagation and scattering it is convenient to invert Eq. (3) to the 2^(nd) order in p and add the absorption term that gives a material equation for bulk elasticity to the 2^(nd) order in p

$\begin{matrix} {{\frac{\delta \; V}{\Delta \; V} = {\frac{\rho_{1}}{\rho} = {{- {\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}} = {{\left\lbrack {1 - {{\beta_{p}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}p}} \right\rbrack {\kappa \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}p} + {{h_{ab}\underset{t}{\otimes}{\kappa \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}p}}}}}{{\beta_{p}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = {{\beta_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\kappa \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}}{{\beta_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = {{1 + \frac{B\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{2{A\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}} = {1 + {\frac{1}{2}{B\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\kappa \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}}}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

where the absorption term is small and we include only 1^(st) order in p. Attenuation of a propagating wave is given by both the extinction coefficient of the incident wave, which is the sum of absorption to heat given by h_(ab), and scattering of the wave.

The 2^(nd) order approximation of Eqs.(1, 3, 4) holds for soft tissues in medical imaging, fluids and polymers in non-destructive testing, and also rocks in seismography that show special high nonlinear bulk elasticity due to their granular micro-structure. Gases generally show stronger nonlinear elasticity, where higher order terms in the pressure often might be included. Micro gas-bubbles with diameter much lower than the acoustic wavelength in fluids, show in addition a resonant compression response to an oscillating pressure which gives a differential equation (frequency dependent) form of the nonlinear elasticity, as described by the Rayleigh-Plesset equation.

To develop a full wave equation, we must include Newtons law of acceleration, that for waves with limited curvature of the wave-fronts can be described in the Lagrange description as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\rho_{0}\frac{\partial^{2}\underset{\_}{\psi}}{\partial t^{2}}} \approx {- {\nabla p}}}{\frac{\partial^{2}{\nabla\underset{\_}{\psi}}}{\partial t^{2}} = {- {\nabla\left( {\frac{1}{\rho_{0}}{\nabla p}} \right)}}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

Both the mass density, the compressibility, and the absorption have spatial variation in many practical materials, like soft tissue and geologic materials. We separate the spatial variation into a slow variation that mainly influences the forward propagation of the wave (subscript a), and a rapid variation that produces scattering of the wave (subscript f), as

ρ₀( r )+ρ_(a)( r )+ρ_(f)( r ) κ( r )=κ_(a)( r )+κ_(f)( r ) β_(p)( r )=β_(pa)( r )+β_(pf)( r )   (6)

Combining Eqs.(4-6)), using 1/ρ₀=ρ_(a)/ρ_(a)ρ₀=(ρ₀−ρ_(j))/ρ_(a)ρ₀=1/ρ_(a)−γ/ρ_(a), γ=ρ_(j)/ρ₀, produces a wave equation of a form that includes nonlinear forward propagation and scattering phenomena as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\underset{\underset{{(1)}{Linear}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{{\nabla^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}} - {\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}} + \underset{\underset{{(2)}{Nonlinear}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{\frac{\beta_{pa}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}} - \underset{\underset{{(3)}{Absorption}}{}}{{{h_{ab}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}\underset{t}{\otimes}\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}\frac{\partial^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}} = {\underset{\underset{{(4)}{Linear}\mspace{14mu} {scattering}\mspace{14mu} {source}\mspace{14mu} {terms}}{}}{{\frac{\beta \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}} + {\nabla\left( {{\gamma \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\nabla{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}} \right)}} - \underset{\underset{\underset{{source}\mspace{14mu} {term}}{{(5)}{Nonlinear}\mspace{14mu} {scattering}}}{}}{\frac{\sigma_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}}}\mspace{79mu} {{c_{0}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{{\rho_{a}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\kappa_{a}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}}}\mspace{79mu} {{\beta \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = \frac{\kappa_{f}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\kappa_{a}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}\mspace{79mu} {{\gamma \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = \frac{\rho_{f}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\rho_{0}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}\mspace{79mu} {{\sigma_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = {{\beta_{pf}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} + {{\beta_{pa}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\beta \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

where we have neglected ∇(1/p_(a)), the low amplitude terms ββ_(pf) of σ_(n), and the 2^(nd) order p² term in the absorption. c₀(r) is the linear wave propagation velocity for low field amplitudes. The left side terms determine the spatial propagation of the wave from the slowly varying components of the material parameters c_(o) (r), β_(pa)(r), and h_(ab)(r, t). The right side terms represent scattering sources that originate from the rapid spatial variation of the material parameters, β(r), γ(r), and σ_(n)(r). β(r) represents the rapid, relative variation of the isentropic compressibility, γ(r) represents the rapid, relative variation of the mass density, while σ_(n)(r) represents the rapid, relative variation of the nonlinear parameters β_(p)(r)κ(r) of Eqs.(4,6).

The linear propagation terms (1) of Eq.(7) guide the linear forward spatial propagation of the incident wave with propagation velocity c₀(r) and absorption given by term (3), without addition of new frequency components. The linear scattering source terms (4) produce local linear scattering of the incident wave that has the same frequency components as the incident wave, with an amplitude modification of the components ˜−ω²/c₀ ² produced by the 2^(nd) order differentiation in the scattering terms, where ω is the angular frequency of the incident wave.

The slow variation of the nonlinear parameters give a value to β_(pa)(r) that provides a nonlinear forward propagation distortion of the incident wave that accumulates in magnitude with propagation distance through term (2) of Eq.(7). A rapid variation of the nonlinear material parameters gives a value to σ_(n)(r) that produces a local nonlinear distorted scattering of the incident wave through term (5) of Eq. (7).

Similar equations for elastic shear waves and electromagnetic waves can be formulated that represents similar propagation and local scattering phenomena, linear and nonlinear, for the shear and EM waves.

B. Nonlinear Propagation and Scattering for Dual Band Pulse Complexes

For estimation of non-linear material parameters, we transmit dual frequency pulse complexes where two examples are shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 1a shows a high frequency (HF) transmit pulse 101 propagating at the crest of a low frequency (LF) pulse 102, where FIG. 1b shows the same transmitted HF pulse 101 propagating at the through of the LF pulse 103, where the example is obtained by inversing the polarity of 102. For estimation of nonlinear parameters, we typically transmit at least two pulse complexes for each transmit beam direction, where the LF pulse varies in amplitude and/or polarity between at least two transmitted pulse complexes, where the LF pulse can be zero (i.e. no transmitted LF pulse) for a pulse complex, and the LF pulse is non-zero for at least one pulse complex. The HF:LF ratio is typically >5:1. For estimation of linear parameters we would preferably transmit only a HF pulse, i.e. the LF pulse is zero, or one could use the sum of the received HF signal from a positive and a negative LF pulse.

We study the situation where the total incident wave is the sum of the LF and HF pulses, i.e. p(r,t)=p_(L)(r,t)+p_(H)(r,t). The nonlinear propagation and scattering are in this 2^(nd) order approximation both given by

$\begin{matrix} {{p\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}^{2} = {\left( {{p_{L}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)} + {p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}} \right)^{2} = {\underset{\underset{\underset{distortion}{{nonlin}\mspace{14mu} {self}}}{}}{{p_{L}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}^{2}} + \underset{\underset{{nonlin}\mspace{14mu} {interation}}{}}{2{p_{L}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}} + \underset{\underset{\underset{distortion}{{nonlin}\mspace{14mu} {self}}}{}}{{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}^{2}}}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

Inserting Eq.(8) into Eq.(7) we can separate Eq.(7) into one equation for the LF and a second equation for the HF pulses as

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{79mu} (9)} & \; \\ {{\underset{\underset{{(1)}{Linear}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{{\nabla^{2}p_{L}} - {\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{L}}{\partial t^{2}}}} + \underset{\underset{\underset{selfdistortion}{{({2b})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {prop}}}{}}{\frac{\beta_{pa}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{L}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}} - \underset{\underset{{(3)}{Lin}\mspace{14mu} {absorpt}}{}}{h_{ab}\underset{t}{\otimes}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{L}}{\partial t^{2}}}} = {\underset{\underset{{(4)}\mspace{14mu} {Linear}\mspace{14mu} {scattering}}{}}{{\frac{\beta}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{L}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}} + {\nabla\left( {\gamma \cdot {\nabla p_{L}}} \right)}} - \underset{\underset{\underset{{scatter}\mspace{14mu} {source}}{{({5b})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {selfd}}}{}}{\frac{\sigma_{n}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{L}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}}} & \left. a \right) \\ {{\underset{\underset{{(1)}{Linear}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{{\nabla^{2}p_{H}} - {\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}}} + \underset{\underset{\underset{{propag}\mspace{14mu} {distortion}}{{({2a})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {interaction}}}{}}{\frac{2\beta_{pa}p_{L}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}} + \underset{\underset{\underset{selfdistortion}{{({2b})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {prop}}}{}}{\frac{\beta_{pa}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}} - \underset{\underset{{(3)}{Absorption}}{}}{{h_{ab}\underset{t}{\otimes}\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}}} = {\underset{\underset{{(4)}\mspace{14mu} {Linear}\mspace{14mu} {scattering}\mspace{14mu} {source}\mspace{14mu} {terms}}{}}{{\frac{\beta}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}} + {\nabla\left( {{\gamma \left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\nabla p_{H}}} \right)}} - \underset{\underset{\underset{{source}\mspace{14mu} {term}}{{({5a})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {interact}}}{}}{\frac{2\sigma_{n}p_{L}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}} - \underset{\underset{\underset{{source}\mspace{14mu} {term}}{{({5b})}{Nonl}\mspace{14mu} {selfdist}}}{}}{\frac{\sigma_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}}} & \left. b \right) \end{matrix}$

where the material parameters c₀(r), β_(pa)(r), β(r), γ(r), σ_(n)(r) all have spatial variation, and the wave fields and absorption kernel p_(L)(r,t), p_(H)(r,t), h_(ab)(r,t) depend on space and time. We note that with zero LF pulse, the HF pulse propagates according to Eq.(9b) with term (2b) and (5b) as zero. The low amplitude, linear propagation velocity is c₀(r) of Eq.(9) that produces linear propagation, term (1), modified by a self-distortion propagation term (2b), that is responsible for the harmonic propagation distortion utilized in harmonic imaging. The scattering is dominated by the linear term (4) where the self-distortion scattering term (5b) is important for scattering from micro-bubbles in a more complex form.

As shown in FIG. 1 we use a temporal HF pulse length T_(pH) that is much shorter than half the period of the LF pulse, T_(L/)2, i.e. the bandwidth of the HF pulse B_(H)>ω_(L)/2, where ω_(L)=2π/T_(L) is the centre angular frequency of the LF wave. For the further analysis we assume that |2β_(p)(r)p_(L)(r,t)|=|x|<<1 which allows the approximation 1−x≈1/(1+x). The propagation terms (1) and (2a) of the left side of Eq.(9b) can for the manipulation of the HF pulse by the co-propagating LF pulse be approximated as

$\begin{matrix} {{\underset{\underset{{(1)}{Linear}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{{\nabla^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}} - {\frac{1}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}} + \underset{\underset{{({2b})}{Nonlinear}\mspace{14mu} {interation}\mspace{14mu} {propagation}}{}}{\frac{2{\beta_{pa}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{p_{L}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}} \approx {{\nabla^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}} - {\frac{1}{{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\left( {1 + {2{\beta_{pa}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{p_{L}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

The numerator in front of the temporal derivative in this propagation operator is the square propagation velocity, and we hence see that the LF pulse pressure p_(t), modifies the propagation velocity for the co-propagating HF pulse p_(H) as

c ₀( r,p _(L))=√{square root over (c ₀ ²( r )(1+2β_(pa)( r )p _(L)( r,t)))}≈c ₀( r )(1+β_(pa)( r )p _(p)( r,t))   (11)

where p_(L)(r, t) is the actual LF field variable along the co-propagating HF pulse. Solving Eqs.(9a,b) for LF and HF transmit apertures with transmit pulse complexes as shown in FIG. 1, gives co-propagating LF and HF pulses along beams, where schematic examples of transmitted HF beams according to the invention are shown as beams 202, 605, 704, and 717 in FIG. 2, 6, 7. As the HF:LF ratio is typically >5:1, often ˜20:1, the LF wavelength is >5-20 times the HF wave length. To minimize diffraction and keep the LF beam adequately collimated, the transmit aperture and beam for the LF pulse is typically much wider than for the HF pulse.

The HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulses. The orthogonal trajectories of the HF pulse wave-fronts are paths of energy flow in the HF pulse propagation. We define the curves Γ(r) as the orthogonal trajectories of the HF pulse wave-fronts that ends at r. Let p_(c)(s)=p·p_(Lc)(s) and c₀(s) be the LF pressure and linear propagation velocity at the centre of gravity of the HF pulse at the distance coordinate s along Γ(r), and p is a scaling factor for polarity and amplitude of the LF pulse. The propagation time-lag of the HF pulse at depth r along the orthogonal trajectories to the HF pulse wave-fronts, can then be approximated as

$\begin{matrix} {{t\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = {{{\int_{\Gamma {(\underset{\_}{r})}}^{\;}\frac{ds}{c\left( {s,{p_{c}(s)}} \right)}}\  \approx {{\int_{\Gamma {(\underset{\_}{r})}}^{\;}\frac{ds}{c_{0}(s)}} - {\int_{\Gamma {(\underset{\_}{r})}}^{\;}{\frac{ds}{c_{0}(s)}{\beta_{pa}(s)}{p_{c}(s)}}}}} = {{{t_{0}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} + {{\tau_{p\;}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\mspace{20mu} {t_{0}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}} = {{\int_{\Gamma {(\underset{\_}{r})}}^{\;}{\frac{ds}{c_{0}(s)}\ \mspace{20mu} {\tau_{p}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}} = {{- p}{\int_{\Gamma {(\underset{\_}{r})}}^{\;}{\frac{ds}{c_{0}(s)}\ {\beta_{pa}(s)}{p_{Lc}(s)}}}}}}}} & (12) \end{matrix}$

The propagation lag with zero LF pulse is t₀(r) given by the propagation velocity c₀(r) that is found with no LF manipulation of the tissue bulk elasticity. τ_(p)(r) is the added nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) of the centre of gravity of the HF pulse, produced by the nonlinear manipulation of the propagation velocity for the HF pulse by the LF pressure p_(c)(s) at the centre of gravity of the HF pulse.

Variations of the LF pressure along the co-propagating HF pulse, outside the centre of gravity of the HF pulse, produces a variation of the propagation velocity along the HF pulse, that in addition to the NPD produces a nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) of the HF pulse that accumulates with propagation distance. For HF pulses much shorter than the LF half period, as shown in FIG. 1, the PFD can be described by a filter. Defining P_(rp)(r, ω) as the temporal Fourier transform of the transmitted HF pulse field that co-propagates with a LF pulse, and P_(r0)(r, ω) as the HF pulse for zero LF pulse, the PFD filter is defined as

$\begin{matrix} {{{P_{tp}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)} = {{V_{p}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)}{P_{t\; 0}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)}}}{{V_{p}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)} = {\frac{P_{tp}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)}{P_{t\; 0}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)} = {{{\overset{\sim}{V}}_{p}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},\omega} \right)}e^{{- i}\; \omega \; {\tau_{p}{(\underset{\_}{r})}}}}}}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

and the subscript p designates the amplitude/polarity/phase of the LF pulse. P_(tp)(r, ω) is obtained from the temporal Fourier transform of p_(H) in Eq.(9b). V_(p) includes all nonlinear forward propagation distortion, where the linear phase component of V_(p) is separated out as the nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) τ_(p)(r) up to the point r as described in Eq.(12). The filter {tilde over (V)}_(p) hence represents the nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) of the HF pulse by the co-propagating LF pulse, and also the nonlinear attenuation produced by the nonlinear self-distortion of the HF pulse.

We note that when the 1^(st) scattering/reflection occurs, the scattered LF pressure amplitude drops so much that after the scattering the LF modification of the propagation velocity is negligible for the scattered HF wave. This means that we only get essential contribution of the LF pulse to the NPD, τ_(p)(r) of Eq.(12), and the PFD, {tilde over (V)}_(p), of Eq.(13), up to the 1^(st) scattering, an effect that we will use to estimate the spatial variation of the nonlinear propagation parameter β_(pa)(r), and the nonlinear scattering given by a σ_(n)(r), and suppress multiple scattered waves (noise) in the received signal to enhance the 1^(st) order linear and nonlinear scattering parameters.

In summary, the nonlinear terms (2a, b) in Eq.(9b) produces a propagation distortion of the HF pulse as:

i) (2a): A nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) τ_(p)(r) produced by the LF pressure at the centre of gravity of the co-propagating HF pulse according to Eq.(12), and is affected by the LF pulse up to the 1^(st) scattering, where the amplitude of the LF pulse drops so much that the nonlinear effect of the scattered LF pulse is negligible for the scattered HF wave.

ii) (2a): A nonlinear propagation pulse form distortion (PFD) of the HF pulse produced by the variation of the LF pulse field along the co-propagating HF pulse according to Eq.(13), and is affected by the LF pulse up to the 1^(st) scattering, where the amplitude of the LF pulse drops so much that the nonlinear effect of the scattered LF pulse is negligible for the scattered HF wave.

iii) (2b): A nonlinear self-distortion of the HF pulse which up to the 1^(st) scattering transfers energy from the fundamental HF band to harmonic and sub-harmonic components of the fundamental HF band, and is hence also found as a nonlinear attenuation of the fundamental band of the HF pulse. It is negligible after the 1^(st) scattering where the amplitude of the scattered HF pulse heavily drops.

The HF scattering cross section given in the right side of Eq.(9b) is composed of a linear component. term (4), and a nonlinear component, term (5), where term (5a) takes care of the variation of the HF fundamental band scattering produced by the LF pulse, while term (5b) represents self distortion scattering that produces scattered signal in the harmonic and sub-harmonic components of the HF-band. This scattering term is however so low that it can be neglected, except for micro-bubbles at adequately low frequency, where the scattering process is described by a differential equation, i.e. highly frequency dependent scattering with a resonance frequency, producing a well known, more complex Rayleigh-Plesset term for HF self distortion scattering.

Because the temporal pulse length of the HF pulse T_(pH)<<T_(L)/2, we can approximate p_(L)(r)≈p_(c)(r) also in the interaction scattering term (5a) of Eq.(9b)

$\begin{matrix} {\underset{\underset{{({5b})}{Interaction}\mspace{14mu} {scatt}}{}}{\frac{2\sigma_{n}p_{L}}{c_{0}^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}p_{H}}{\partial t^{2}}} \approx \underset{\underset{{{({5b})}{LF}} - {{HFInteraction}\mspace{14mu} {scattering}}}{}}{\frac{2{\sigma_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{p_{c}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}{c_{0}^{2}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}\frac{\partial^{2}{p_{H}\left( {\underset{\_}{r},t} \right)}}{\partial t^{2}}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

where p_(c)(r) is the LF pressure at the centre of gravity of the co-propagating HF pulse as for the NPD propagation term in Eq.(12).

The scattering from the rapid, relative fluctuations in the compressibility, β(r), is a monopole term that from small scatterers (dim<˜¼ HF wave length) give the same scattering in all directions, while the scattering from the rapid, relative fluctuations in the mass density, γ(r), is a dipole term where the scattering from small scatterers depends on cosine to the angle between the transmit and receive beams [18]. For a given angle between the transmit and receive beams one can hence for the fundamental HF band write the scattering coefficient as a sum of a linear scattering coefficient and a nonlinear scattering coefficient as

$\begin{matrix} {{\sigma \left( {\omega,\underset{\_}{r},p_{c}} \right)} = {- {\frac{\omega^{2}}{c_{0}^{2}}\left\lbrack {{\sigma_{l}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} + {2{p_{c}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}{\sigma_{n}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}}} & (15) \end{matrix}$

σ_(i)(r) represents the sum of the linear scattering from fluctuations in compressibility and mass density. For larger structures of scatterers (dim>˜HF wave length), like for example layers of fat, muscle, connective tissue, or a vessel wall, the total scattered wave will be the sum of contributions from local parts of the structures which gives a directional scattering also influenced by the detailed shape of the structures [18].

The effect of the low frequency (LF) pulse on the received HF signal, can hence be split into three groups with reference to Eq.(9b):

Group A is the effect of the nonlinear propagation term (2a). It is found in the received signal with transmission through the object with tomographic measurements, and in the linearly scattered signal from term (4). It represents the accumulative nonlinear propagation distortion of the HF incident pulse produced by the LF pulse, i.e. term (2a). This group is split into a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) according to Eq.(12) (i above), and nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) according to Eq.(13) (ii above), and

Group B originates directly in the local nonlinear interaction scattering of the LF on the HF pulse, i.e. term (5a), where the local LF pulse pressure at the co-propagating HF pulse exerts an amplitude modulation of the scattered wave, proportional to p_(c)(r). It is generally useful for detection of micro-bubbles and micro-calcifications, and

Group C is found as local nonlinear self distortion scattering from term (5b) of the forward accumulative nonlinear propagation components in the incident wave. However, typical nonlinear material parameters are so low that this group is negligible, except for micro-bubbles and micro-calcifications in some situations.

Methods and Instruments for Measurement and Estimation

Example embodiments of the invention will now be described in relation to the drawings. The methods and structure of the instrumentation are applicable to both electromagnetic (EM) and elastic (EL) waves, and to a wide range of frequencies with a wide range of applications. For EL waves one can apply the methods and instrumentation to both shear waves and compression waves, both in the subsonic, sonic, and ultrasonic frequency ranges. We do in the embodiments describe by example ultrasonic measurements or imaging, both for technical and medical applications. This presentation is meant for illustration purposes only, and by no means represents limitations of the invention, which in its broadest aspect is defined by the claims appended hereto.

FIG. 2 shows by example an instrument setup according to the invention for measurement and estimation of local linear, and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters in the object 200. 201 shows a transmit array system for transmission of pulses into the object. Acoustic contact between the transmit and receive (208) arrays can for example be obtained by immersing the object in a fluid (214), e.g. water, which for example is common with breast tomography, (FIG. 6), or other types of acoustic stand-off between the receive probe and the object, or direct contact between the probes and the object. With EM waves vacuum forms a good contact between the transmitters and the object, while fluids or soft tissue can provide contact for adequately small dimensions.

For estimation of nonlinear parameters the methods comprises transmitting at least two pulse complexes composed of co-propagating high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pulses, where said HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulse along at least one HF transmit beam, and where at least one of the amplitude and polarity of the LF pulse varies between at least two transmitted pulse complexes, where the amplitude of the LF pulse can be zero for a pulse complex and the amplitude of at least one LF pulse of said at least two transmitted pulse complexes is non-zero, as described in relation to FIG. 1 above. A preferred embodiment would be arranged to estimate both linear and nonlinear parameters, where 201 would be arranged to be able to transmit dual band pulse complexes, also including a zero LF pulse.

An example HF beam in the object is indicated as 202, with the HF pulse propagating to the right along the beam indicated as 203 at a particular time in the propagation. A LF pulse is, at the same time point, indicated as 205 with the positive swings as grey, co-propagating with the HF pulse to the right to manipulate both the propagation velocity and the scattering of the HF pulse, as discussed in Section 5.1B above. The HF pulse is indicated to be located at the crest of the LF pulse as indicated in FIG. 1a . The HF pulse is scattered both linearly and nonlinearly, Eqs.(9b,14,15) as it propagates along the beam, and generates a scattered HF wave field propagating as a Mach-cone indicated by the front waves 206 and 207.

Element 208 shows a HF receive array and processing system, where the Figure shows by example one HF receive cross-beam 209, where the HF receive cross-beam axis 212 crosses the HF transmit beam axis 213 at 211. An x-y-z Cartesian coordinate system shows the HF transmit beam axis along the z-direction and the HF receive cross-beam in the x-direction, where the x-axis is in the paper plane, and the y-axis is vertical to the paper plane. In this example, the coordinate system is defined so that the HF transmit aperture has the centre r _(ti)=(x_(i),y_(i), 0), and the HF receive cross-beam aperture has the centre at r _(rj)=(−x_(r), y_(j), z_(j)), preferably with focus at the crossing of the HF transmit and receive beam axes. The overlap of the HF transmit and receive beams define a cross-beam observation cell R_(ij) of scatterers, centered at 211 with the position r _(ij)=(x_(i),y_(i),z_(j)) that defines an image measurement point r.

With single HF transmit and receive cross-beams one will observe a scattered signal from a single cross-beam observation cell R(r) centered at r. However, scanning the HF receive cross-beam axis along the HF transmit beam axis as indicated by the dots 210, allows measurement of scattered HF cross-beam receive signals from cross-beam observation cells centered at a set of crossing positions r _(ij) between the HF transmit axis starting at r _(ti), and receive beam axes starting at r _(rj), j=1, . . . , J. This can be done in time series by transmitting a LF-HF pulse complex for each HF receive cross-beam position, or with time parallel HF receive beam forming with focus at several locations along the HF transmit beam, for measurements of the scattered HF cross-beam receive signal at these locations along the HF transmit beam. The array 208 can for example be a linear array, or a phased array, receiving in parallel on all elements where the element signals are coupled to a parallel receive beam former, producing in parallel individual receive signals for a set of receive cross-beams, all focused at different locations on the HF transmit beam axis.

For 2D or 3D imaging, one can use as system set up to scan the LF-HF transmit beam laterally (x-direction) or vertically (y-direction) as indicated by the arrows 204, in order to irradiate a 2D or 3D section of at least a region of the object. With a matched scanning of the HF receive cross-beam focus along each HF transmit beam axes, gives a 2D/3D set of HF cross-beam receive signals scattered from cross-beam observation cells R_(ij) defined by the crossings of the HF transmit and receive beams and centered at the crossing of the HF transmit and receive cross-beam axes at r _(ij). We label the positions of the array origin of the HF transmit beam axes by the coordinate vectors r _(ti), i=1, . . . , I, and the positions of the array origin of the receive beam axes by the coordinate vectors r _(rj), j=1, . . . , J. The distance between transmit beam axes is Δr_(i), and between the receive beam axes the distance is Δr_(r). Note that to minimize the dimension of R_(ij) one would adjust the aperture and focus of the HF receive cross-beams for narrow receive focus at the actual HF transmit beam axis.

The HF cross-beam receive signals are processed in the receive unit 208 to provide linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters for each measurement point r _(ij) in the scanned region with spatial resolution given by the dimension of the cross-beam observation cells R_(ij), as described below. The unit 208 also contains a display system for the images. To give an impression of a continuous image in the display, one typically introduces interpolated image display values between the image measurement points r _(ij).

To simplify notation in the equations below, we label r _(ij)=r. The HF cross-beam receive signals are composed of three components: i) a linear scattering component y_(ip)(t,r), and ii) a nonlinear scattering component 2p_(c)(r)y_(np)(t,r) where p_(c) is the LF pulse amplitude defined in Eq.(12,14), and iii) followed by a multiple scattering component n_(p)(t,r), illustrated in FIG. 3. The receive signal for each measurement point r can hence be modeled as

y _(p)(t,r )=y _(lp)(t,r )+2p_(c)( r )y _(np)(t,r )+n _(p)(t,r )   (16)

y _(llnp)(t,r )=∫d ³ r ₀ A( r−r ₀ ,r )u _(p)(t−τ _(p)( r )−τ_(f)( r−r ₀ ,r )−(|r ₀ −r _(r) |+|r ₀ −r |)/c ₀ ,r )σ_(lln)( r ₀)

where we have defined p as a scaling and polarity factor of the LF pressure as in Eq.(12), i.e. p_(c)(r)=p·p_(Lc)(r)·r ₀=(x₀, y₀, z₀) is the scatterer source point, and σ_(l)(r ₀) and r _(n)(r ₀) are the linear and nonlinear HF scattering densities from Eqs.(9b,14,15). The combined HF receive, A_(r), and HF transmit beam, A_(t), amplitude weighting around the image measurement point r=(x, y, z) defines the cross-beam observation cells A(r−r ₀,r)=A_(r) (y−y₀,z−z₀,x)A_(t)(x−x₀, y−y₀,z). u_(p)(·,r) is the received HF pulse from a point scatterer within the cross-beam observation cell R(r) centered around the image point r, that observes a nonlinear propagation delay (NPD) τ_(p)(r) according to Eq.(12), and a nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) according to Eq.(13) for the transmit pulse propagation up to depth r. The NPD and PFD vary so slowly with position that we approximate it as constant within each observation cell.

τ_(j)(r−r ₀,r)=τ₁(r−r ₀,z)+(r−r ₀,x) is the sum of the HF transmit beam focusing phase delay τ₁ and the HF receive beam focusing phase delay τ_(r), and |r ₀−r ₁|+|r ₀−r _(r)| is the total propagation distance of the pulse from the transmit aperture centered at r _(t) to the scatterer at r ₀ and to the receiver aperture centered at r _(r). Close to the focus of a HF receive or transmit beam we can approximate τ_(r) or τ_(t)≈0. A preferred system allows for adjustment of the HF receive cross-beam focus onto the HF transmit beam axis, which allows the approximation τ_(r)≈0 in the observation cell, while for a fixed transmit focus τ₁≠0 for r outside the HF transmit focus. Lateral filtering of the HF cross-beam receive signal provides a synthetic focusing in the actual image range, as discussed in relation to Eqs.(18, 19) below. This allows the approximation of both τ_(t), τ_(r)≈0.

Schematic example received scattered signals from HF receive cross-beam 210 are shown in FIG. 3 at a given image point r=(x,y,z). The upper signal 301 shows the situation when the HF pulse propagates close to the positive crest of the LF pulse as in FIG. 1a , the middle signal 302 shows the situation when the LF pulse is zero, and the lowest signal 303 shows the situation when the LF pulse is inverted so that the HF pulse propagates close to the trough of the LF pulse as in FIG. 1b . All signals comprises a first part 304 generated by 1^(st) order scattering from the cross-beam observation cell R(r) around r=(x,y,z) with a propagation time lag given by the distance |r ₀−r _(t)|+|r ₀−r _(r)| in the models of Eqs.(14-16). After this 1^(st) part of the scattered signal follows a tail of weaker signals 305 that is the multiple scattered signal n_(p) (t,r) within the HF transmit beam before the last scattering in the overlap between the receive beam and the multiple scattered beam.

From Eqs. (11, 12) we see that p>0 provides a nonlinear increase in the HF propagation velocity that advances the arrival time (negative delay) of the scattered signal compared to for p=0, and p<0 provides a nonlinear decrease in the HF propagation velocity that delays the arrival time (positive delay) of the scattered signal compared to that for p=0. The 304 part of 301 is an advancement of the 304 part of 302, i.e. a negative NPD τ₊(r)<0 according to Eq.(12). The 304 part of 303 is in the same way a delay of 302, i.e. a positive NPD τ⁻(r)>0, where the subscript + and − and 0 indicates with reference to FIG. 1, measurements with a positive (102), negative (103) and zero transmitted LF pulse. The amplitude of the LF pulse drops so much in the 1^(st) scattering that the advancement/delay of the multiple scattered signal n_(p) (t,r) (305) is much less than for the 1^(st) part 304. Crossing side lobes, grating lobes and edge waves of the transmit and receive beams can add noise components that arrives before the 1^(st) order scattered component 304 from the cross-beam observation cell. These noise components are suppressed by proper apodization of transmit and receive beam apertures. Temporal Fourier transform of the front part 304 of the received signal in Eq.(16) gives

Y _(p)(ω, r )=U _(p)(ω, r ), e ^(−iωτ) ^(p) [X _(l)(ω, r )+2p _(c)( r )X _(n)(ω, r )]

X _(lln)(ω, r )=∫d ³ r ₀ A( r−r ₀ ,r )e ^(−iω(τ) ^(f) ^((r−r) ⁰ ^(,r)+(|r) ⁰ ^(−r) ^(t) ^(|+|r) ⁰ ^(−r) ^(r) ^(|)/c) ⁰ ⁾σ_(lln)( r ₀)

where X_(i)(ω,r) and X_(n)(ω,r) are the temporal Fourier transforms of the linear and nonlinear scattering components from the cross-beam observation cell centered at r. The exponential function arises from the delay components in the temporal argument of u_(p) in Eq.(16).

One will ideally set a narrow focus of the HF receive cross-beam essentially on the transmit beam axis. In the y- and z-directions the observation region is therefore generally limited by a narrow receive beam, but in the x-direction the observation region is limited by the x-width of the transmit beam. As the transmit beam operates with a fixed transmit focus, the transmit beam width varies with depth z outside the focus. For z outside the focal region, the HF transmit beam can therefore be wide both in the azimuth (x−) and elevation (y−) direction.

When 3D scanning of a stationary object is available, one can obtain synthetically focused transmit and receive beams through spatial filtering of measurement signals as

Ŷ _(p)(ω, r )=∫d ³ r ₀ W(ω,r−r ₀ ,r )Y _(p)(ω, r )   (18)

W(ω, r−r ₀ ,r )=B(ω, r−r ₀ ,r )e ^(iωτ) ^(f) ^((r−r) ⁰ ^(,r)) where B is a weighting function to reduce spatial side-lobes of the filter. The filter kernel can be obtained from simulation of the transmit and receive beams to obtain τ₁(r−r ₀,r) and τ_(r)(r−r ₀,r). Eqs.(31-33) below also present methods of estimating τ₁(r−r ₀,r) and τ_(r)(r−r ₀,r) that corrects for wave front aberrations due to spatial variations in the propagation velocity within the object. The filter amplitude weighting B, can conveniently be proportional to the amplitude of the simulated beams, potentially with added windowing. When the receive beam is focused onto the transmit beam axis, we can approximate τ_(r)≈0 within in the observation region. The integration is then done over the transversal coordinate to the transmit beam axis, r _(⊥)=(x,y), as

Ŷ _(p)(ω, r )=d ² r _(⊥) W(ω, r−r _(⊥) ,z)Y _(p)(ω, r _(⊥) , z)   (19)

W(ω, r−r _(⊥) , z)=B(ω, r−r _(⊥) , z)e ^(iωτ) ^(t) ^((r−r) ^(⊥) ^(,z))

When the y-width of the receive beam focus is sufficiently narrow, the integration over r _(⊥) can be approximated by an integration in the x-direction (azimuth) only, with a filter adapted for use with 2D scanning of the transmit beam in the x-direction.

One advantage of the synthetic focusing is that the cross beam observation cell is reduced, and the approximation that the NPD and PFD are constant in the observation cell becomes more accurate, i.e. improves the approximation of taking τ_(p)(r) and U_(p)(ω, r) outside the integral in Eq.(17). The synthetic focus filtering also provides images with improved spatial resolution. From the models in Eqs.(12,16,17), we can determine τ_(p)(r) from the delay between the front parts 304 of two of the signals 301-303, or all three signals in combination. This can for example be done through correlation between the Pt order scattered front part 304 of the HF cross-beam receive signals from pulse complexes with different LF pulses, or by measuring the arrival time difference between the front edge of the signals, or a combination of both. An advantage of the method as described is that we have first intervals of the measured signals that comprises mainly 1^(st) order scattering, which gives a clear definition of τ_(p)(r ₁,z) in Eq.(12) at depth z along the transmit beam axis starting at r _(t). A schematic example of τ_(r _(t),z) is shown as 401 in FIG. 4.

Having measured τ_(p)(r ₁,z_(j)) at a set of points z_(i) with distance Δz we can from Eq.(12) estimate the nonlinear propagation parameter

$\begin{matrix} {{\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)} \approx {{- \frac{c_{0}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)}{p_{c}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\;},z_{j}} \right)}}\frac{{\tau_{p}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)} - {\tau_{p}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j - 1}} \right)}}{\Delta \; z}}} & (20) \end{matrix}$

where 402 in FIG. 4 shows by example the z-differential of τ_. From the description of Eq.(12), p_(c)(r _(t),z_(j)) is the LF pressure approximately at the centre of gravity of the HF pulse, and c₀(r _(t),z_(j)) is the linear propagation velocity at the same position, i.e. z_(j) along the transmit beam axis starting at r _(t). The spatial variation of c₀(r _(t),z_(j)) in soft tissue is ˜±4%, and is for image reconstruction approximated by a constant 1540 m/s, which is also a useful approximation in Eq.(20-22). As described in relation to Eqs.(29,30) below, one can obtain local estimates of c₀(r) from a first estimate of β_(pa)(r _(t),z) with constant c₀, and then modify the first estimate of β_(pa)(r _(t),z) with the new estimate c₀(r), for example in an iterative procedure. With a ring array as in FIG. 6 one can estimate locally varying c₀(r) with tomographic methods [13-16], and use this estimate in Eqs.(20-22). This opens for a combination of β_(p) and c₀ for the tissue characterization, as discussed below.

Low-pass filtered differentiation can be obtained by combining more samples of the NPD at different depths along the HF transmit beam, for example as

$\begin{matrix} {{\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)} \approx {{- \frac{c_{0}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)}{p_{c}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{j}} \right)}}{\sum\limits_{n \in N}{a_{n}{\tau_{p}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{n}} \right)}}}}} & (21) \end{matrix}$

where a_(n) are filtering coefficients and N describes an interval of terms. Allowing for reduced spatial resolution in the estimate of β_(pa), one can also in Eq.(21) include weighted sums along neighbouring transmit beams (i.e. along r _(t)) to reduce noise in the estimate, according to known methods. One can also use nonlinear differentiation, for example through minimizing a functional of the form

$\begin{matrix} {{{J\left\{ {\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)} \right\}} = {\int_{I}{{dz}\left\{ {{{W_{\beta}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)}{{{\tau \left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)} - {\int_{0}^{z}{{\frac{{dz}_{0}}{c_{0}} \cdot {\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{0}} \right)}}{p_{LF}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z_{0}} \right)}}}}}} + {{W_{n}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)}{{\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)}_{z}}}} \right\}}}}\mspace{20mu} {{{Subject}\mspace{14mu} {to}\mspace{14mu} {constraint}\text{:}\mspace{14mu} \beta_{p,{m\; i\; n}}} < {\beta_{pa}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},z} \right)} < \beta_{p,{{ma}\; x}}}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

where β_(pa)(r ₁,z)_(z) denotes the gradient with respect to z, and W_(β) and W_(n) are weights to be chosen to balance between rapid response to spatial changes in β_(p)( ) for high values of W_(β)/W_(n), and noise reduction for low values of W_(β)/W_(n). We can also include integration/summation for neighbouring transmit beams, i.e. along r _(t) to reduce noise at the cost of lower spatial resolution, as for the linear estimation in Eq.(21).

With a 2D or 3D scanning of the transmit and receive beams, we note that Eqs.(20-22) presents a quantitative spatial imaging of the nonlinear elastic tissue parameter, where FIG. 5 shows by example typical values of β_(pa)=β_(na)κ_(a) for connective (501), glandular (502), and fat (503) tissues in breast. We note that the difference of β_(p) between the different tissues is so large that it makes estimation of the β_(p) parameter very interesting for tissue characterization, for example detection and characterization of cancer tumors and atherosclerotic arterial plaque.

The nonlinear scattering is found at highly local points from micro-bubbles and hard particles like micro-calcifications, and the nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD) can hence from Eqs.(13,17-19) be estimated as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\overset{\sim}{V}}_{\pm}\left( {\omega,z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}} \right)} = {\frac{U_{\pm}\left( {\omega,z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}} \right)}{U_{0}\left( {\omega,z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}} \right)} = \frac{{{\hat{Y}}_{\pm}\left( {\omega,z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}} \right)}e^{i\; \omega \; {\tau_{\pm}{({z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}})}}}}{{\hat{Y}}_{0}\left( {\omega,z,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}} \right)}}} & (23) \end{matrix}$

We define a Wiener form of inversion of {tilde over (V)}_(p)(z,ω;r _(t)) as

$\begin{matrix} {{H_{+ {/ -}}\left( {\omega,{z;{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}}} \right)} = {\frac{1}{{\overset{\sim}{V}}_{+ {/ -}}\left( {\omega,{z;{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}}} \right)}\frac{1}{1 + {\mu/{{{\overset{\sim}{V}}_{+ {/ -}}\left( {\omega,{z;{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t}}} \right)}}^{2}}}}} & (24) \end{matrix}$

where the parameter μ is adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio in the filtered signal.

Ŷ_(p)(ω,r _(i)) as given in Eqs.(17-19) for image points r _(ij) is subject to absorption of the HF pulse both along the HF transmit and the HF receive cross-beams. When estimates of the tissue absorption exist, for example from ultrasound tomography imaging [13-17], the absorption can be compensated for. When such estimates do not exist, it is in ultrasound imaging common to use a depth varying gain control, either set manually or through some automatic estimation. Assuming that the receive signal in Eqs.(16-19) has undergone some depth gain adjustment to compensate for absorption, we can from Eqs.(17-19) obtain absorption compensated estimates of the linear and nonlinear scattering components as

${{\hat{X}}_{l}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)} = {\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{H_{+}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}e^{{- i}\; \omega \; {\tau_{+}{({\underset{\_}{r}}_{i})}}}{{\hat{Y}}_{+}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}} + {{H_{-}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}e^{i\; \omega \; {\tau_{-}{({\underset{\_}{r}}_{i})}}}{{\hat{Y}}_{-}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}}} \right)}$ ${{\hat{X}}_{n}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)} = {\frac{1}{4{{p_{c}\left( {\underset{\_}{r}}_{i} \right)}}}\left( {{{H_{+}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}e^{{- i}\; \omega \; {\tau_{+}{({\underset{\_}{r}}_{i})}}}{{\hat{Y}}_{+}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}} + {{H_{-}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}e^{i\; \omega \; {\tau_{-}{({\underset{\_}{r}}_{i})}}}{{\hat{Y}}_{-}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}}} \right)}$

We could then for example display |{circumflex over (X)}_(l)(ω, r _(i))| and |{circumflex over (X)}_(n)(ω,r _(i))| at a typical frequency, say the centre frequency ω₀ of the HF band, or an average of |{circumflex over (X)}_(l)| and |{circumflex over (x)}_(n)| across a band B of strong frequency components within the HF band, for example

$\begin{matrix} {{{D_{l}\left( {\underset{\_}{r}}_{i} \right)} = {\frac{1}{B}{\int_{B}{d\; \omega {{{\hat{X}}_{l\;}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}}}}}}{{D_{n}\left( {\underset{\_}{r}}_{i} \right)} = {\frac{1}{B}{\int_{B}{d\; \omega {{{\hat{X}}_{n}\left( {\omega,{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i}} \right)}}}}}}} & (26) \end{matrix}$

Other alternatives are to show the average of the square |{circumflex over (X)}_(lln)(ω,r _(i))|².

When p_(c) is unknown, we still get an interesting visualization of the spatial variation of the nonlinear scattering without the scaling of 1/p_(c) in Eqs.(20-22) for example to detect and visualize micro-bubbles or micro-calcifications in the tissue. When estimates of local absorption are available, these can be combined with Eq.(25) by anyone skilled in the art to obtain quantitative estimates of both linear and nonlinear scattering, that is useful for tissue characterization, for example of cancer tumors and atherosclerotic plaques.

We notice from Eqs.(16-19) that several scatterers within the cross-beam observation cell can participate to the front signal 304 in FIG. 3, which produces an interference pattern (speckle) in this part of the signal that depends on the relative position between the participating scatterers and the directions of the HF transmit and receive cross-beams. Using several HF receive cross-beams crossing the HF transmit beam with different directions at the same image position r, as shown by the examples 609, 612 in FIGS. 6 and 704, 705 in FIG. 7a , then provides several HF receive signals with different speckle (interference patterns) that can be used for statistical averaging in the signal processing to reduce random errors in the estimation of the nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters. In the example system shown in FIG. 2 we could for example within this frame of thinking also use HF receive cross-beams with different directions, and also have HF receive beams crossing the HF transmit beam in the opposite direction of 209 at the image point r at 211. This would require a HF receive array at the opposite side of the object that still could be operated by the same parallel HF receive beam former as 209.

The separate transmit and receive array systems in FIG. 2 can conveniently be substituted with a dual frequency ring array used for combined transmit and receive, shown as 600 in FIG. 6. The ring array surrounds an object 606 that is in acoustic contact with the ring array through a substance 614, typically a fluid like water or an oil. The ring array structure allows through-transmission of the ultrasound, typically used for ultrasound tomography imaging of objects, such as the breast and the male testicles.

Element 601 of FIG. 6 shows a set of HF transmit/receive elements and 602 shows a set of LF transmit elements of ring array 600, for example described in more detail in [5-7]. The HF and LF elements are connected to a transmit switching system 603, that selectively connects a group of HF and LF elements to a HF and LF transmit system 604 comprising a HF and LF transmit beam former to generate selectable and/or steerable HF and LF transmit beams, where 605 shows an example HF transmit beam through the object 606. The HF array elements are also connected to a HF receive switching system 607, that selectively connects a group of HF elements to a HF receive system 608 comprising a HF receive beam former, that generates selectable and/or steerable HF receive cross-beams, where 609 shows an example crossing the transmit beam 605 at the observation cell 615, and a receive processing system 610 as described in relation to FIG. 2a to present estimates of linear and nonlinear object parameters.

Element 612 shows a further example HF receive cross-beam that crosses the HF transmit beam at the same cross-beam observation cell 615 as the HF receive cross-beam 609 with a different direction, and hence obtains a different speckle pattern of the front part 304 HF cross-beam receive signal, than for the HF receive cross-beam 609, as discussed in relation to FIG. 3, above. To obtain several HF receive cross-beams at different directions for each image point, indicated by the dots 613, the HF receive switching system connects selectable groups of HF array elements to the HF receive system 608 that produces a selectable number of HF cross-beam receive signals with different speckle of the front part 304, from selectable HF receive cross-beams in parallel. The variation in speckle in these different HF cross-beam receive signals from the same image point r allows for statistical averaging in the signal processing to reduce random errors in the estimates of the nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters. The subunits 603, 604, 607, 608 are connected to a processor and display system 610 via the bus 611 for set up, transmission, processing, and display of image data, according to known methods.

Because the modification of the bulk elasticity elasticity of the tissue by the LF pulse severely drops at the first scattering, as discussed following Eq.(13), the methods according to the invention as described above, do not require through-transmission through the object. A full ring array is therefore not necessary for these methods, where one for example could operate with a “horse-shoe” array extraction of the ring array 600 to emulate the functional essence of the array system in FIG. 2. A 360 deg ring array would however open for more measurements, such as direct transmission through the object, that can be used to improve spatial resolution and estimation accuracy of the NPD and PFD, using tomographic techniques. Such a ring array can also be used for tomographic estimation of local tissue absorption and linear propagation velocity according to known methods that can be combined with methods according to this invention for improved detection and characterization of disease in tissue, as discussed in relation to Eqs.(28-37) below.

We further notice that measurement of through transmission of the HF pulses with a ring array can also be used to improve accuracy of estimates of the nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters with tomographic methods, where for example the values obtained according to the methods described above could be used as starting values in an iterative tomographic procedure, e.g. the “bent ray” method described in the following citations to obtain more accurate values.

Hormati A, Jovanovi I, Roy O, Vetterli M: “Robust Ultrasound Travel-time Tomography Using the Bent Ray Model” Medical Imaging 2010: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, Ed: J D'Hooge, S A McAleavey, Proc SPIE Vol. 7629, 76290I

Li C, Duric N, Littrup P, Huang L: “In Vivo Breast Sound-Speed Imaging with Ultrasound Tomography”, Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 October; 35(10) 1615-1628

Opielinski K J, Pruchnicki P, Gudra T, Podgorski P, Krasnicki T, Kurcz J, Sasiadek M: “Ultrasound Transmission Tomography Imaging of Structure of Breast Elastography Phantom Compared to US, CT, and MRI.” Archives of Acoustics, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 321-334 (2013)

Opielinski K J, Pruchnicki P, Szymanowski P, Szeoieniec W K, Szweda H, Swis E, Jozwik M, Tenderenda M, Bulkowski M: “Multimodal ultrasound computer assisted tomography: An approach to the recognition of breast lesions.” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 65 (2018) 102-114

Huang L, Shin J, Chen T, Lin Y, Intrator M, Hanson K, Epstein K, Sandoval D, Williamson M: “Breast ultrasound tomography with two parallel transducer arrays: Preliminary clinical results”. Medical Imaging 2015: Ultrasound Imaging and Tomography, Ed: J. G. Bosch, N Duric, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 941916.

An example structure for assessment of nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters using a limited access area of the object, is shown in FIG. 7a , where 701 shows an array probe arrangement that is in direct contact with only one side of the object 700, for example the surface of a body. The probe front comprises a combined LF and HF array, 702, where selectable elements are used to transmit LF and HF pulse complexes, where 703 shows an example, schematic HF transmit beam. HF receive elements are selected from the array elements to define HF receive cross-beams, where an example, schematic HF receive cross-beam is shown as 704. 705 shows another example, schematic HF receive cross-beam crossing the HF transmit beam at the same cross-beam observation cell 706 as 704 at a different angle, to obtain a HF receive signals with different speckle, for the same purpose as described for the beam 612 in FIG. 6. Through selection of one or both of i) transmit and receive array elements, and ii) transmit and receive delays, both the HF transmit and receive beams can according to known methods be scanned one or both of i) laterally along the probe surface, and ii) angularly from a given selection of elements, to generate crossing HF transmit and receive beams and move the cross-beam observation cell 706 within a region of the object, for estimation of linear and nonlinear object parameters using methods as described in relation to FIG. 2.

The strong angular steering of the HF transmit and receive beams in FIG. 7a requires down to) λ_(HF)/2 pitch of the HF array, which increases the required number of elements. FIG. 7b shows a modification that allows the use of wider pitch of the elements, and also the use of annular arrays and even fixed focus transducers, to estimate linear and nonlinear wave propagation and scattering parameters in a cross-beam observation cell 719 of the object 710. 711 shows a combined transmit and receive system that comprises a LF and HF transmit array 712 and a HF receive array 713, embedded in a fluid filled region 714 to provide wave propagation contact to the object. Embedment in the fluid allows mechanical rotation of the arrays around the axes 715 and 716, or other mechanical movement of the arrays, potentially in combination with electronic scanning of the beam directions according to known methods. The LF-HF transmit array is connected to a transmit beam former inside the system 711 where the resulting HF transmit beam is shown schematically as 717. The HF receive array 713 is connected to a HF receive beam former inside 711 that is used to define HF receive beams, for example schematically as 718, and further connected to a receive processing system according to the methods described in relation to FIG. 2. The beam formers and processing structures operates and are implemented according to known methods, and details are therefore not shown in the Figure. The system allows crossing HF transmit and receive beams with an overlap 719 that defines the transmit-receive cross-beam observation cell 719 that can be scanned within a region of the object, exemplified with 720, by scanning the receive and/or the transmit beams as described for 211 in relation to FIG. 2 and to Eqs. (16-24).

The coupling medium 714 between the transmit and receive (712, 713) arrays and the object allows the transmit and receive arrays to have an angle to the object surface, which hence allows for larger pitch of the array elements. With linear arrays one can scan the transmit and receive beams side-ways for imaging of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters as presented in relation to FIG. 2. Mounting the transmit and receive arrays 712 and 713 to rotating shafts 715 and 716, respectively, allows mechanical scanning of the transmit and receive beams that enlarges the number of measurement observation regions that can be obtained. The arrays 712 and 713 can then be reduced to annular arrays with sharp symmetric focusing, and even fixed focused transducers for a limited number of cross beam observation regions. Mechanical scanning of the beams in an elevation direction (normal to the paper plane) also opens for 3D imaging of regions of the object with methods according to this invention. These solutions also allow for low cost systems for estimation of linear and nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters in selected regions of an object.

The system according FIG. 7b can conveniently be simplified for objects that are approximately homogenous, such as the muscle of a fish or even a human, to measure for example uniform fat content in the muscle. One then can use fixed directions of fixed focused annular transmit and HF receive arrays (712, 713) that provides a fixed cross-beam observation region. From the measured NPD one can estimate the nonlinear propagation factor as

$\begin{matrix} {\beta_{pa} = {- \frac{{\tau ({cell})} - {\tau (0)}}{{T({tissue})}p_{c}}}} & (27) \end{matrix}$ T(tissue)=(T(cell)−T(surface)/2

where τ(cell) is the measured NPD at the cross-beam observation cell 719, τ(0) is a previously measured NPD from the transmit array 712 through the acoustic contact medium 714 to the surface of the object, and T(tissue) is the propagation time from the probe surface to the centre of the cross-beam observation cell. The composition of the homogeneous tissue can then be obtained from a table of prior data.

We note that the direct measurement of the effect of nonlinear elasticity parameter {circumflex over (β)}_(pa) as in Eqs.(20-22) produces a result that according to Eqs.(1-11) depend on both the direct nonlinear elasticity parameter B(r) and the compressibility κ=1/A. When we have an estimate of κ(r) we note from Eq.(4-11) that we can estimate the pure nonlinear elasticity term B(r) from the estimate {circumflex over (β)}_(pa)(r) in Eqs.(20-22, 27) as

$\begin{matrix} {{\hat{B}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = {\frac{2}{\hat{\kappa}}\left( {\frac{{\hat{\beta}}_{pa}}{\hat{\kappa}} - 1} \right)}} & (28) \end{matrix}$

where the hat denotes estimates. This introduces a pure nonlinear elasticity parameter with less correlation to the linear parameter A(r)=1/κ(r) and c₀(r). However, the effect of B on the nonlinear elasticity is also determined by how much the material compresses from a given pressure, that makes B/A=Bκ a better description of the relative effect of nonlinear elasticity on wave propagation, as described following Eq.(1). With the further development to the wave equation, Eqs.(7,9), we note that it is the slowly varying component β_(pa)=(1+B_(a)κ_(a)/2)κ_(a) that affects the forward wave propagation and determines the NPD and the PFD. This is one reason that Ballou found a high correlation between B/A and c₀ (See. Hartmann B: “Potential energy effects on the sound speed in liquids” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65(6), June 1979:1392-1396.)

When estimates of c₀(r) exist, for example from ultrasound tomography or other, one can also obtain estimates of the nonlinear elasticity parameters B/A and B defined in Eqs.(1-4). One can for example use an empirical relation is κ=κ(c₀), or for example an approximate linear correlation between the mass density and the isentropic compressibility as

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{20mu} {{\hat{\rho} \approx {b - {a\; \kappa}} \approx {1362 - {{0.81 \cdot 10^{12}}\kappa}}}\mspace{20mu} {\kappa = {{1/\rho}\; c_{0}^{2}}}{\hat{\kappa} \approx \frac{b - \sqrt{b^{2} - {4{a/c_{0}^{2}}}}}{2a} \approx \frac{1362 - \sqrt{1362^{2} - {4 \cdot 0.81 \cdot {10^{12}/c_{0}^{2}}}}}{2 \cdot 0.81 \cdot 10^{12}}}}} & (29) \end{matrix}$

Within this approximation one can hence obtain estimates of both the local mass density and the local compressibility of the tissue from c₀(r). One could also use more complex parametric models of the relationship between mass density and isentropic compressibility.

The high correlation between β_(pa) and κ_(a) can also be used to generate estimates ĉ₀(r), for example as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\hat{c}}_{0}\left( {\hat{\beta}}_{pa} \right)} \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left( {b - {a\; {\hat{\kappa}\left( {\hat{\beta}}_{pa} \right)}}} \right){\hat{\kappa}\left( {\hat{\beta}}_{{pa}\;} \right)}}}} & (30) \end{matrix}$

where {circumflex over (κ)}({circumflex over (β)}_(pa)) is an empirical relation between {circumflex over (β)}_(pa) and {circumflex over (κ)}. Eq.(330) then implies that ĉ₀ itself could be directly obtained from an empirical relation between {circumflex over (β)}_(pa) and ĉ₀.

Such estimates for ĉ₀ could be used as initial values for iterative improvement procedures of estimates of c₀(r), for example to form start parameters in iterative “bent ray” estimation procedures to estimate the spatially varying linear wave propagation velocity and absorption, for example according to tomographic methods disclosed in Hormati A, Jovanovi I, Roy O, Vetterli M: “Robust Ultrasound Travel-time Tomography Using the Bent Ray Model” Medical Imaging 2010: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, Ed: J D'Hooge, S A McAleavey, Proc SPIE Vol. 7629, 76290I; Li C, Duric N, Littrup P, Huang L: “In Vivo Breast Sound-Speed Imaging with Ultrasound Tomography”, Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 October; 35(10) 1615-1628; Opielinski K J, Pruchnicki P, Gudra T, Podgorski P, Krasnicki T, Kurcz J, Sasiadek M: “Ultrasound Transmission Tomography Imaging of Structure of Breast Elastography Phantom Compared to US, CT, and MRI.” Archives of Acoustics, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 321-334 (2013); and Opielinski K J, Pruchnicki P, Szymanowski P, Szeoieniec W K, Szweda H, Swis E, Jozwik M, Tenderenda M, Bulkowski M: “Multimodal ultrasound computer assisted tomography: An approach to the recognition of breast lesions.” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 65 (2018) 102-114.

When a first image of c₀(r _(ij)) is estimated, one can use these values to estimate corrections for wave front aberrations in the heterogeneous medium for both the transmit and the receive beams. We describe two methods for estimation of corrections for wave front aberrations for focusing the transmit and/or receive beams from an array aperture S_(rf) onto the focal point r _(f). We assume S_(rf) comprises a set of K elements out of the total number of elements in the array, where r _(k) is the centre of array element #k. We first do spatial interpolation of c₀(r _(ij)) to c₀(r) with an adequately low spatial sampling distance.

In the first method we start by numerical simulation of the wave propagation from a point source in the focal point at r _(f) to the actual array aperture, through the heterogeneous object with spatially varying propagation velocity c₀(r). We write the simulated wave function at the centre r _(k) of array element #k as g (r _(k),r _(f),ω), where ω is the angular frequency of the point source at the focal point r _(f). We note that g(r _(k),r _(f),ω) is the Greens function for the point source at r _(f). We then filter the transmit pulse for each element by the filter

H(rr _(k) ,r _(f),ω)=A( r _(k) ,r _(f))g( r _(k) ,r _(f),ω)*k=1, . . . , K   (31)

where A (r _(k),r _(f)) is the standard amplitude apodization of the transmit pulse across the actual aperture S_(rf). The phase of g represents both the standard focusing delay for beam forming in a homogeneous medium, and together with the amplitude of g an optimal correction for the wave front aberrations due to the spatially varying propagation velocity [8,9]. The major component of this filter is however the linear component of the phase that represents a delay correction for the wave front aberrations.

This first method requires a large numerical simulation capacity, which has a practical solution using Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). A less computer intensive approach can be obtained with ray acoustics techniques. We define c as the spatial average of c₀(r) over the actual region in front of the array. The well-known differential equation for an acoustic ray r(s) that passes normal to the acoustic wave fronts, is given as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\frac{d}{ds}\left( {n\; \frac{d\underset{\_}{r}}{ds}} \right)} = {\nabla n}}{{n\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)} = \frac{\overset{\_}{c}}{c_{0}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}} & (32) \end{matrix}$

where s is the arc-length along the ray (i.e. r(s) is a taxameter representation of the ray) and n(r) is the spatially varying refractive index of the material. To focus the transmit or receive beams onto the focal point r _(f), we simulate numerically Eq.(32) for the acoustic ray r _(fk)(s) from the focal point r _(f) to the centre r _(k) of array element #k. The beam steering delay for element #k is then calculated as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\tau_{f}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{f}} \right)} = {\frac{1}{\overset{\_}{c}}\left\lbrack {{{al}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{f}} \right)} - {{al}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{0},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{f}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}{{{al}\left( {{\underset{\_}{r}}_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{f}} \right)} = {\int_{{\underset{\_}{r}}_{fk}}{{dsn}\left( \underset{\_}{r} \right)}}}{{k = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},K}} & (33) \end{matrix}$

where al (r _(k),r _(f)) is the acoustic length of the acoustic ray r _(fk)(s) from r _(f) to r _(k).

For best results one should do 3D scanning of the beams to obtain 3D images of c₀(r _(ij)) as described above. For corrections of wave front aberrations, the array should with mechanical elevation scanning be of the 1.75D type with larger elements in the elevation direction used for beam focusing and aberration corrections. With a full matrix array, one obtains electronic focusing and beam steering both in the azimuth and elevation directions. For stationary objects the aberration corrections can be included in the filter functions W(w,r−r ₀,r) for synthetic focusing of the observed beams. Hence with mechanical scanning in the elevation direction, we can avoid deviding of the arrays in the elevation direction, as focusing in the elevation direction can be done in the synthetic focusing.

We note that the NPD and the PFD estimated with the crossing transmit and receive beams can also be used in the processing of back-scattered HF signals obtained with a HF receive beam axis along or close to the HF transmit beam axis, as for example described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,641,613; 8,038,616; 8,550,998; 9,291,493 to suppress multiple scattering noise and estimate nonlinear scattering for received HF back-scatter signals. The back scatter images have better spatial resolution in range, and is also the type of images currently in general use, while the cross beam method provides more accurate estimation of the spatial variation of the NPD and PFD with less influence from multiple scattering noise.

It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 9,291,493 that Class I and II multiple scattering noise are equal for equal transmit and receive beams, which is a great advantage for combined suppression of both noise classes, as described in the cited US patents. For back-scatter imaging it is hence an advantage to form receive beams that are equal to the transmit beams, i.e. same focus, aperture, and apodization. This, however, gives fixed focused beams, but synthetic depth focusing of the combined transmit/receive beam can be obtained by lateral filtering of the received HF back-scatter receive signals as in Eq.(19).

A useful method is therefore to couple the array elements to a receive beam former that in parallel produces receive cross beams that crosses the transmit beams like in FIGS. 2, 6, 7 a, and 7 b, and back-scatter HF receive beams close to equal to the HF transmit beams. For further processing both the cross beam and back-scatter receive HF signals from the transmitted pulse complexes for each HF transmit beam are stored. The HF cross-beam receive signals are used for estimation of at least the spatially varying NPD, τ_(p)(r), as described above, and potentially also the {tilde over (V)}_(p)(r,ω), the β_(pa)(r), the ĉ₀(r), the H(r _(k),r _(f)), and the τ_(j)(r _(k), r _(j)) as described in Eqs.(18-32) above.

The HF back-scatter receive beam signals are then for each HF receive beam axis filtered laterally as given in Eq.(19) at a selected set of depths z_(i) to form synthetically focused HF back-scatter receive signals at said selected depths as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,291,493. These filtered back-scattered HF receive signals are then corrected for propagation delay and potentially also pulse form and speckle distortion, and combined for suppression of multiple scattering noise and also for estimation of nonlinear scattering, as described in said patent.

Estimation of H (r _(k), r _(f)), and the τ_(f)(r _(k),r _(f)) from the cross beam signals as described in Eqs.(31-33) above, also allows for correction of the wave front aberrations in the synthetic focusing filtering of Eq.(19), according to known methods.

With the advances in compact computer storage and processing performance, the invention also devices a method for combined HF cross-beam and back-scatter imaging where the HF receive signals for the individual HF array elements are digitized and stored for each transmit pulse complex and each transmit beam. The stored receive element signals are then first processed to i) generate focused HF receive beams crossing the HF transmit beams for example as shown in FIGS. 2, 6, 7 a, and 7 b, according to known methods. The receive HF cross-beam signals are then used for estimation of at least the spatially varying NPD, τ_(p)(r), and potentially also the {tilde over (V)}_(p)(r,ω), as described above, and further β_(pa)(r), the ĉ₀(r), the H (r _(k),r _(f)), and the τ_(f)(r _(k),r _(f)) as described in Eqs.(20-24) and Eqs.(29-33) above.

In further steps, the method applies further processing on the stored element signals to ii) form a set of HF back-scatter receive signals from HF receive back-scatter beams with axis along or close to the HF transmit beam axis and aperture, focus, and apodization that are equal to that of the HF transmit beams, and iii) The HF back-scatter receive signal contains multiple scattering noise that can be strongly suppressed by delay corrections and potentially also speckle and pulse form corrections of the HF back-scatter receive signals, and combining the corrected HF back-scatter signals from transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,038,616; 8,550,998; 9,291,493, to produce noise suppressed HF back scatter receive signals; and iv) perform synthetic dynamic focusing of the noise suppressed HF back-scatter receive signals by lateral filtering of the HF back-scatter receive signals at selected depths according to Eq.(19). Estimated H (r _(k),r _(j)) or τ_(j)(r _(k),r _(f)) according to Eqs.(31,33) under point i) then allows for correction of the wave front aberrations in the lateral filtering.

With such scanning of the HF transmit and receive beams in a 2D or 3D manner, the methods hence allow formation of 2D and 3D back-scatter images with suppression of multiple scattering noise and also focus corrections of the wave front aberration effect of spatial variations in ultrasound propagation velocity.

FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of an example instrument for carrying out imaging according to this method. 800 shows a 3D ultrasound probe comprising a dual frequency linear array 801 with a set of M LF elements and N HF elements in an azimuth direction indicated by the arrows 806. The dual frequency band linear array can be made according to known methods, for example as described in [5] U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,156. The LF and HF elements of the array are via a cable 802 connected to a transmit/receive unit 803 that connects each LF array element to LF transmit amplifiers, and each HF element to HF transmit/receive circuits comprising a HF transmit amplifier and a HF receive amplifier where the output of the HF receive amplifier is further connected to an analog to digital converter (A/D) presenting a digital representation of the HF received signals from all HF receive elements, according to known methods. The AD converter can in a modified embodiment present digital representations of the I-Q components of the HF receive signals from each HF element that represents the same information as the radio frequency (RF) HF signal, according to known methods.

For 3D scanning of the ultrasound beams, the linear array 801 can in this example embodiment be rotated around the long axis 804 that provides a mechanical scanning of the LF/HF beam in an elevation direction, indicated by the arrows 805. For each elevation position of the array, one does electronic scanning of a combined LF/HF transmit beam in an azimuth direction indicated by the arrows 806, through electronic selection of transmitting LF and HF elements, and transmitting combined LF/HF pulse complexes similar to what is shown in FIG. 1, with selected beam directions and focus. An example HF transmit beam is illustrated schematically as 807 within a 2D azimuth plane 808 with given elevation position within a total 3D scan volume 809. Alternative elevation movements of the array, like side-ways movement can equivalently be done according to known methods, depending on the space available for such movement, and the shape of the object.

At least two pulse complexes with different LF pulses, for example as illustrated in FIG. 1, are transmitted for each transmit beam direction. The LF pulse might be zero in one pulse complex per HF transmit beam, but must be non/zero in at least one pulse complex for each HF transmit beam.

Two versions of the instrument are useful, where in the first version 803 comprises beam former for HF receive cross-beams, illustrated as 814 in the 2D scan plane 808, and HF back scatter receive beams with the same axis as the HF transmit beam 807. In a preferred embodiment the HF back-scatter receive beam is equal to the HF transmit beam as this improves suppression of multiple scattering noise in the HF back-scatter receive signal, as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,291,493. During the scan, the HF cross-beam and back-scatter receive signals are via the high speed bus 810 transferred to the processor 811 for storage and further processing.

The processor 811 comprises a multicore central processing unit (CPU) and a graphics processor unit (GPU) that are SW programmable. The processor receives user inputs from a user/operator input unit 813 that operates according to known methods, and displays image data and other information necessary for communication with the user/operator through a combined display and audio unit 812, according to known methods.

In the second version, the digital HF receive signals from each HF receive elements and each transmitted pulse complex are via the high speed bus 810 transferred to the processor 811 for storage and further processing. For 2D imaging in the second version, a SW program in the processor 811 combines HF receive signals from multiple HF receive elements and produces a set of HF receive cross-beams crossing each HF transmit beam in the 2D set, for example as described in relation to FIG. 7a . A SW program also produces a set of HF back-scatter receive signals from HF back-scatter receive beams with the same axis as the HF transmit beams, and preferably also equal to the HF transmit beams.

Example transmit and receive beams are shown in FIG. 9, where 901 shows by example a combined HF transmit beam, H_(t), and HF back-scatter receive beam, H_(br). The spatial frequency responses of the HF transmit n′beam and the HF back-scatter receive beam are H_(f)(r−r ₁,ω) and H_(br)(r−r ₁,ω). The position vector r _(f)(i,j) defines the origin of the HF transmit and receive beam axes, where i defines the azimuth aperture centre element position, and j defines the 2D scan plane elevation position in a 3D scan. 902 shows an example HF receive cross-beam focused at the HF transmit beam axis at depth z_(k), H_(cr)(r−r _(r),ω), wherer _(r)(i,j,k) defines the origin of the HF receive cross-beam axes, where i, j defines the azimuth and elevation position, and k defines the depth of the cross-over image point z_(k) that is also the focus point of H_(cr). 903 shows a cross-beam observation cell by the cross-over region between a HF transmit beam and the HF receive cross-beam, and 904 shows an indication of a HF cross beam receive signal from the whole cross-over region. By selecting a limited interval of this HF receive signal, the effective range of the observation cell is reduced along the cross-beam axis to the hatched region 905. A schematic form of the HF back-scatter observation cell is shown as the hatched region 906, along the HF combined transmit and back-scatter receive beams 901.

The dimensions of the observation cells can be reduced by filtering of the received signals, as shown in Eqs.(18,19). Estimates of the NPD and PFD can then be obtained from the HF cross-beam receive signals at several observation cells along each transmit beam direction, f.ex. as described in relation to FIG. 3 and Eq.(23). Estimates of the nonlinear propagation parameter and {circumflex over (β)}_(pc)(r) and the quantitative propagation parameter {circumflex over (β)}_(pa)(r) along the same HF transmit beam directions f.ex. according to Eqs.(20-22) or similar. This gives a 2D image of an estimate{circumflex over (β)}_(pa)(r) within a 2D scan plane, indicated as 808. Using Eqs.(23-26) one can obtain a 2D cross-beam image of the linear and nonlinear scattering within the 2D scan plane. Display of the 2D image data are shown on the display unit 812.

When we have an estimate of the linear compressibility across the 2D scan plane, {circumflex over (κ)}(r)=1/A(r) for example from other sources, we obtain a 2D image estimate of the nonlinear parameter B(r) or B(r)/A(r) from Eq.(28). When spatial estimates of the linear propagation velocity c₀(r) exists, we can produce spatial estimates of the linear compressibility according to Eq.(29). Other estimates of the compressibility can be obtained from empirical correlation with the linear compressibility and {circumflex over (β)}_(pa)(r), for example obtained by machine learning, which then could give estimates of c₀(r) as in Eq.(30). This equation also gives direct empirical correlation between {circumflex over (β)}_(pa)(r) and the linear propagation velocity c₀(r).

From estimates of the linear propagation velocity, the processor can calculate corrections for wave front aberrations produced by the spatial variations in c₀(r), for example according to Eqs.(31-33). These aberration correction estimates can then be included in the filter kernels of Eqs.(18,19) to provide improved beam focusing with corrections for these aberrations, that reduces the dimension of the observation range cells. The processing on the element signals can then be carried through in several steps, where first a synthetic focusing of the HF receive beam and the HF transmit beam for the HF cross-beam receive signal according to Eqs.(18,19) are obtained with a spatially constant propagation velocity estimate, for example c₀=1540 m/s. This leads to a first estimate of a spatially varying c₀(r) that opens for corrections for wave front aberrations in a second step, producing improved image estimates with lower dimension of the cross-beam observation cells. This leads to improved estimates of c₀(r) that is used for improved corrections for wave front aberrations in a next step, leading to further improved image estimates with lower dimension of the cross-beam observation cells, and so on.

With the final estimate of c₀({circumflex over (r)}), one can from Eqs.(31-33) calculate wave front aberration corrections for the combined HF transmit beam and the HF back-scatter receive beam. These corrections are then included in a lateral filtering of the HF back-scatter receive signals at selected depths, to provide synthetic focusing of the combined HF transmit and backscatter receive beams at said selected depths.

With 3D scanning of the beams we get 2D data from several neighbouring 2D scan planes. Filters as in Eqs.(18,19) can now produce a 2D synthetic focusing of both the transmit and receive beams both in the azimuth and the elevation directions to minimize the observation cells at all depths along the transmit beams. The estimation of material data and images proceeds otherwise in the same manner as above for each 2D scan plane, to produce 3D images of material parameter estimates. The 3D synthetic focusing will produce smaller image cells with more accurate spatial estimates of the parameters, and improved corrections for wave front aberrations.

For good suppression of multiple scattering noise in the HF back-scatter receive signals, it is advantageous to use equal HF transmit and back-scatter receive beams, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,291,493. The HF back-scatter receive signal for an image pixel depth z_(k)=ct_(k)/2, where t_(k) is the arrival time for the signal for that pixel, can be modeled as

Y _(p)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)=U(ω)∫d ² r _(t1) H _(t)(z _(k) ,r _(t) −r _(r1),ω)²σ_(p)( r _(r1))    (34)

where H_(t)H_(br)=H_(t) ² because the HF back-scatter receive beam and transmit beams are equal. The back-scatter observation cell is defined by the HF pulse length in the z direction, and is hence short. A very useful synthetic focusing of the HF back-scatter receive signal can then be obtained by only transversal filtering of the HF back-scatter receive signal at fixed depth as

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{{\hat{Y}}_{pf}\left( {z_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},\omega} \right)} = {{U(\omega)}{\int{d^{2}r_{t\; 2}{W_{rt}\left( {z_{k},{{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t} - {\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 2}},\omega} \right)}{Y_{p}\left( {z_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 2},\omega} \right)}}}}} \\ {= {{U(\omega)}{\int{{dz}_{1}d^{2}r_{t\; 1}{H_{f}\left( {z_{k},{{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t} - {\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 1}},\omega} \right)}{\sigma_{p}\left( {\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 1} \right)}}}}} \end{matrix} & (35) \\ {{H_{f}\left( {z_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t},\omega} \right)} = {\int{d^{2}r_{t\; 2}{W_{rt}\left( {z_{k},{{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t} - {\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 2}},\omega} \right)}{H_{t}\left( {z_{k},{\underset{\_}{r}}_{t\; 2},\omega} \right)}^{2}}}} & \; \end{matrix}$

To minimize the width of H_(f) in the transversal direction r _(t) we chose the filter kernel W_(rt) so that the phase gradient of the Fourier transform H_(f) in the transversal direction is zero. Denoting the Fourier transform in the transversal coordinates by F_(rt){ } the convolution gives

F _(n) {H _(f)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)}=F _(n) {W _(rt)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)}F _(n) {H _(t)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)²}

F _(n) {W _(n)(z _(k) ,r _(r),ω)}=A _(rt)(z _(k) ,k _(t),ω)e ^(−iφ) ^(rt) ^((z) ^(k) ^(,{circumflex over (k)}) ^(r) ^() φ) _(n)(z _(k) ,k _(t))=

F _(n) {H _(t)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)²}  (36)

where k _(t) is the Fourier coordinates in the transversal plane, and A_(rt) is an apodization function to reduce sidelobes. In particular is the so-called matched filter

F _(n) {W _(rt)(z _(k) ,r _(t),ω)}=(F _(n) {H _(t)(z _(k) ,r _(r),ω)²})*   (37)

useful, which includes both phase correction and apodization. Wave front aberrations can be included in our model of the HF transmit beam frequency response H_(t) according to known methods, and the focus filtering in Eqs.(35-37) then also corrects for wave front aberrations.

For special versions of the processing one might also use all LF/HF array elements to transmit LF/HF beams that are approximately plane in the azimuth direction. Transmitting azimuth plane waves in several directions one can combine the received signals from the different directions to produce synthetic transmit beams focused at different locations within the 2D plane, according to known methods [4]. With a single azimuth direction azimuth plane wave, one can obtain spatial resolution with regular back-scatter registration of several parallel, dynamically focused receive beams, where time of arrival of scattered pulses produces spatial resolution along the depth of each receive beam, while the receive beam focusing produces lateral spatial resolution, all according to known methods. This method is however more sensitive to multiple scattering noise than the cross beam method described in relation to FIGS. 2, 6, and 7 a, b.

The methods and instrumentation described above provides quantitative tissue images that opens for improved detection of tissue diseases, such as cancer and atherosclerotic plaques. It also opens for artificial intelligence (AI) detection and characterization of such diseases, when 3D data of the diseased tissue and some surrounding tissue is available.

Thus, while there have shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention.

It is also expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps, which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for estimation of propagation and scattering parameters in an object, comprising transmitting at least two pulse complexes composed of an overlapping high frequency (HF) and a low frequency (LF) pulse along at least one LF and HF transmit beam axis, where said HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulse, and where one of the amplitude and polarity of the LF pulse varies between the at least two transmitted pulse complexes, where the amplitude of the LF pulse can be zero for a pulse complex and the amplitude of the LF pulse for at least one pulse complex of said at least two transmitted pulse complexes is non-zero, and directing at least one HF receive cross-beam to cross said at least one HF transmit beam axis at an angle >20 deg to form cross-beam observation cells by the cross-over regions defined by the product between each of said at least one HF receive cross-beam and each of said at least one HF transmit beam, and recording at least two HF cross-beam receive signals scattered from object structures in each cross-beam observation cell from said at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses, and processing said HF cross-beam receive signals for each said at least one HF receive cross-beams to provide at least one of i) an estimated nonlinear propagation delay (NPD), and ii) an estimated nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD), iii) of the transmitted HF pulse at image points along said at least one HF transmit beam axis where said HF transmit beam axis and said at least one HF receive cross-beam axis have shortest distance within each of said cross-beam observation cells, and using said estimated PPD and/or NPD for further processing to form measurements of object propagation and scattering parameters at said image points.
 2. The method of claim 1, where said at least one HF receive cross-beam axis crosses the axis of said at least one HF transmit beam.
 3. The method of claim 2, where said at least one HF receive cross-beam is focused on the axis of said at least one HF transmit beam.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: directing more than one HF receive cross-beam that crosses said at least one HF transmit beam at different directions with HF receive beam axes that crosses the HF transmit beam axes at essentially the same location close to an image point, and recording at least two scattered HF cross-beam receive signals for each said HF receive cross-beams scattered from the same pulse complexes with different LF pulses, and comparing said at least two scattered HF cross-beam receive signals for each said HF receive cross-beam, to estimate at least one of i) the NPD, and ii) the PFD, of the transmitted HF pulse, and combining said estimated PFD and/or NPD for each said HF receive cross-beams, to form new estimated PFD and/or NPD with reduced estimation error for said image point, and using said new estimated PFD and/or NPD for further processing.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving HF scattered signals from the HF transmitted pulses for at least two HF receive cross-beams that crosses a HF transmit beam at a distance along the HF transmit beam that defines at least two image points at the shortest distance between said at least one HF transmit beam and at least two HF cross beams, and estimating an NPD for each HF receive cross-beams, and estimating at least one of i) a local nonlinear propagation parameter through combining the estimated NPD for said at least two HF receive beams that crosses at a distance along each HF transmit beam, and ii) an average NPD of the transmitted HF pulse for said at least two image points.
 6. The method of claim 5, where said local nonlinear propagation parameter is scaled with an estimate of the LF pulse pressure at the location of the HF pulse at said each image point to provide a quantitative estimate of the nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p) at said each image point.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting said pulse complexes along a selected group of neighbouring HF transmit beams, and receiving scattered HF cross-beam receive signals from the HF transmitted pulse for at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses for a selected group of neighbouring HF receive cross-beams for each of said neighbouring HF transmit beams, where said selected group of HF transmit beams and HF receive cross-beams defines a selected group of image points, and combining in a filtering process the HF receive cross-beam signals from several of said selected group of image points to for at least one image point provide synthetically focused HF cross-beam receive signals produced by scatterers in a synthetically focused observation cell around said at least one image point with reduced dimension compared to the original observation cell, and where said synthetically focused HF cross-beam receive signals are used in the further processing.
 8. A method for measurement of linear and nonlinear scattering parameters in an object according to claim 1, further comprising: correcting said at least two HF cross-beam receive signals with one or both of i) an estimated NPD, and ii) an estimated PFD, to produce at least two corrected HF cross-beam receive signals, and combining said at least two corrected HF cross-beam receive signals to form estimates of one or both of i) the nonlinearly scattered HF signal, and ii) the linearly scattered HF signal from at least one observation region.
 9. The method of claim 8, where said at least one HF transmit beam is scanned through a region of the object as one of i) across a 2D surface region, and ii) across a 3D region, and receiving for selected HF transmit beams within said region, HF receive signals scattered from the HF transmitted pulse for at least two HF receive beams with close distance along each selected HF transmit beam, and processing said HF receive signals to form one of both of 2D and 3D images at image points within said 2D and 3D region of at least one of i) an estimate of the NPD, and ii) an estimate of a nonlinear propagation parameter, and iii) a quantitative estimate of a nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p)(r), and iv) an estimate of the linearly scattered signal, and v) an estimate of the nonlinearly scattered signal, at image points.
 10. The method of claim 9, where for each selected group of HF transmit beams one uses HF receive beams equal to the transmit beams to receive at least two HF back-scatter signals from transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses, and correcting said at least two HF back-scatter signals with at least one of i) an estimated NPD and ii) and estimated pulse form and speckle distortion to provide at least two corrected HF back-scatter signals, and combining said at least two corrected HF back-scatter signals to provide HF noise suppressed back-scatter receive signals with suppression of multiple scattering noise.
 11. The method of claim 10, where one of i) said received HF back-scatter signals, and ii) said HF noise suppressed receive signals, are laterally filtered at selected depths to provide synthetically focused HF signals focused at said selected depths.
 12. The method of claim 9, where said quantitative estimate of the spatially varying nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p)(r) is used as input for at least one of i) improved detection of abnormal tissue regions, and ii) characterization of abnormal tissue regions, and iii) estimating local changes in tissue properties during therapy, and iv) estimating changes in local tissue temperature during HIFU therapy, and v) estimating the spatially varying linear propagation velocity c₀(r).
 13. The method of claim 1, where a selected group of said estimated parameters are used as starting values in an iterative procedure for tomographic reconstruction of parameters with improved accuracy.
 14. The method of claim 12, where said estimated spatially varying propagation velocity c₀({circumflex over (r)}) is used for estimation of aberration corrections of at least one of the at least one HF receive beams and the at least one HF transmit beams.
 15. An instrument for carrying through the method of claim 1, comprising operator input/output unit for setting up the instrument components for a selected function, transmit means for transmitting at least two pulse complexes composed of an overlapping high frequency (HF) and a low frequency (LF) pulse along at least one LF and HF transmit beam axis, where said HF pulse propagates close to the crest or trough of the LF pulse, and where one of the amplitude and polarity of the LF pulse varies between the at least two transmitted pulse complexes, where the amplitude of the LF pulse can be zero for a pulse complex and the amplitude of the LF pulse for at least one pulse complex of said at least two transmitted pulse complexes is non-zero, and receive means for directing at least one HF receive cross-beam to cross said at least one HF transmit beam axis at an angle >20 deg to form cross-beam observation cells by the cross-over regions defined by the product between each of said at least one HF receive cross-beam and each of said at least one HF transmit beam, and recording means for recording at least two HF cross-beam receive signals scattered from object structures in each cross-beam observation cell from said at least two transmitted pulse complexes with different LF pulses, and processing means for processing said at least two HF cross-beam receive signals for each said at least one HF receive cross-beams to for at least one image point provide estimates of at least one of the parameters i) an estimated nonlinear propagation delay (NPD), and ii) an estimated nonlinear pulse form distortion (PFD), and iii) an estimate of the linearly scattered signal, and iv) an estimate of the nonlinearly scattered signal, and v) an estimate of a spatially varying nonlinear propagation parameter, and vi) an estimate of a spatially varying quantitative nonlinear propagation parameter β_(p)(r), and vii) an estimate of a spatially varying linear propagation velocity c₀({circumflex over (r)}), and viii) local estimates of the object mass density and the isentropic linear compressibility, and ix) estimates of local changes in tissue properties during therapy, and x) estimates of changes in local tissue temperature during HIFU therapy. xi) —display means for display of said estimated parameters.
 16. The instrument of claim 15, further comprising means for directing more than one HF receive cross-beam that crosses said at least one HF transmit beam at different directions with HF receive beam axes that crosses the HF transmit beam axes at essentially the same location close to an image point, and means for recording at least two scattered HF cross-beam receive signals for each said HF receive cross-beams scattered from the same pulse complexes with different LF pulses, and means for comparing said at least two scattered HF cross-beam receive signals for each said HF receive cross-beam, to estimate at least one of i) the NPD, and ii) the PFD, of the transmitted HF pulse, and means for combining said estimated PFD and/or NPD for each said HF receive cross-beams, to form new estimated PFD and/or NPD for said cross-over region with reduced estimation error for said image point, and means for further processing of the HF receive signals utilizing said new estimated PFD and/or NPD to form estimates of said parameters.
 17. The instrument of claim 16, where said transmit means transmit at least two pulse complexes along multiple HF transmit beam axes within one of a 2D and a 3D region of the object, and said receive means and recording means receives and records HF cross-beam receive signals for multiple image points along each multiple HF transmit, and said processing means processes said at least two HF cross-beam receive signals scattered from pulse complexes with different LF pulses for each said multiple HF receive cross-beams, to at said multiple image points provide estimates of at least one of said parameters.
 18. The instrument of claim 17, where 2D scanning of the transmit beam and HF receive beams are obtained with an electronic array and beam-forming, while scanning in the elevation direction is obtained with mechanical movement of the array.
 19. The instrument of claim 15, where said at least one HF receive beam is focused close to an image point along the axis of a crossing HF transmit beam.
 20. The instrument of claim 15, where said transmitter means comprises an array of separate LF and HF elements and said receiver means comprises HF array elements that are selected within a selectable group of said HF transmit elements.
 21. The instrument of claim 15, where said transmitter means and said receiver means are arranged as separate units.
 22. The instrument of claim 21, where said array of LF and HF elements are arranged as a structure surrounding the object, and where said processing means is further arranged to estimate propagation and scattering parameters using tomographic methods.
 23. The instrument of claim 15, where said processing means is arranged to use estimates of nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters to establish initial values in an iterative tomographic procedure to estimate the spatially varying linear propagation velocity and spatially varying HF absorption in the object.
 24. The instrument of claim 23, where said processing means is organized to utilize the estimates of the spatially linear propagation velocity and HF absorption to obtain improved estimates of the nonlinear propagation and scattering parameters.
 25. The instrument of claim 16, where said transmitter means comprises separate HF and LF transducer elements, and said receiver means is set up to use the HF transducer elements to produce HF back-scatter receive beams that are co-aligned with the HF transmit beams with the same beam axes, in addition to said HF cross-over receive beams, said processor means is arranged to from one or both of said estimated NPD and PFD to estimate noise corrections for the HF back-scatter receive signals, and said processor means is arranged to correct the HF back-scatter signals with said estimated noise corrections to produce corrected HF back-scattered signals, and said processor means is arranged to combine said corrected HF back-scattered signals to produce estimates of one or both of i) linear HF backscatter signal with suppression of multiple scattering noise, ii) nonlinear HF back-scatter signal with suppression of multiple scattering noise.
 26. The instrument of claim 17, where said HF transmit and said co-aligned HF back-scatter receive beams are scanned together in a 2D or 3D manner across a region of the object, to produce 2D or 3D back-scatter images of at least one of i) linear HF back-scatter signal with suppression of multiple scattering noise, and ii) nonlinear HF back-scatter signal with suppression of multiple scattering noise.
 27. The instrument of claim 25, where said transmit and receive means are set up to produce equal HF transmit and HF back-scatter receive beams, and said processor means is arranged to for a selection of depths to combine one of i) HF back-scatter receive signals, and ii) HF back-scatter receive signals with suppression of multiple scattering noise, for neighbouring transmit-receive beams using differing weights of a focusing filter for each depth, to provide synthetic focusing of the combined HF transmit and receive beams at said selection of depths for HF back-scatter receive signals with suppression of multiple scattering noise.
 28. The instrument of claim 15, where said processing means is set up to use said estimate of the linear propagation velocity c₀({circumflex over (r)}) to estimate corrections for the wave front aberrations for at least one of i) the HF transmit beams, and ii) the HF receive beams.
 29. The instrument of claim 27, where said processing means is set up to adjust the weights of said focusing filter so that wave front aberration corrections is done in said lateral focus filtering procedure. 